|
To Have or to Be? | 
 enlarge | Author: Erich Fromm
Publisher: Continuum
Category: Book
List Price: $17.95
Buy New: $10.97
You Save: $6.98 (39%)
New (22) Used (11) from $10.00
Rating:  11 reviews
Sales Rank: 82867
Media: Paperback
Edition: Revised
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 182
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.5
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5 x 0.6
ISBN: 0826417388
Dewey Decimal Number: 128
EAN: 9780826417381
ASIN: 0826417388
Publication Date: September 23, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: GREAT BUY!Brand New From US Distributor! WE ARE A 5 STAR SELLER with OVER 3,500,000 BOOKS SOLD!!! OVER ~ 675,000 FEEDBACKS ~ POSTED!!!
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
One of the seminal books of the second half of the 20th century, this is Fromm's manifesto for a new social and psychological revolution to save our threatened planet.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 6 more reviews...
 Great Book - Only For People With Active Brains :-) July 5, 2006
19 out of 20 found this review helpful
Seriously, if you are opening this book, be prepared to use your brain for real or spare yourself the trouble. First, to paraphrase a foreword from a non-English translation, you need to be aware that Fromm is the analyst, and not the sweet-sounding visionary. So, the last part of the last chapter is best served by skipping it or browsing with the smile, remembering that even great analysts sometimes can't resist the temptation to 'envision' a 'recipe'.
The rest of the book, or should I say the actual book, is pure gold, but in order to reach it you need to be prepared to simply trust the author for the duration of the book. Then turn around and if you don't start recognizing things he's talking about in real life - feel free to debate him - during the second reading. If you jump to debate him every time he crushes something you consider 'sacral' you'll just waste your time. Consider this a test of your own brain - is it really working or just being busy filtering the uneasy information.
Also, be prepared to read the book twice, even if you don't feel like debating it :-) The reason is that pretty soon you'll want to quote something from the book but you won't have an easy one-liner. To quote Fromm, you'll need to quote the idea, and ideas take a few paragraphs or even pages to be 'painted' and understood properly.
Last but not least, be aware that Fromm himself was aware of the fact that the one who is discovering or telling a new thing doesn't actually have the vocabulary to express it, so be prepared to fill in and consider it normal if some words don't sound precise or modern. For example, Fromm didn't have the vocabulary of the communication theory so he couldn't spell out loud the role of communication in human relations, but he did use the word 'affecting' in ways that will allow you to see the intrinsic human need for communication.
That is another reason why you need to be able to both trust the author on the first read and keep your own brain ready to use. It's only after you finish the book that the whole picture will start to form and connect apparently missing pieces - and you will read it the second time.
Great book April 11, 2006
1 out of 7 found this review helpful
Gives some food for thought and a different perspective on what's going on in todays society.
For serious reader May 2, 2005
29 out of 29 found this review helpful
Fromm is one of the classics - along with Freud, Jung, Adler. He studied psychology, philosophy and sociology, received his PhD at the age of 22, became interested in Zen Buddhism at the age of 26. One of the true geniuses.
This book was written in 1976. Fromm debates that there are two possible modes of living: one of having and of being. He points out the differences between the two and of a person living in the having mode to the one living in the being mode. He shows the differences in behavior and attitude between the two in many life's areas and experiences: studying, remembering, talking, reading, faith, love, handling authority. The less you are oriented on having, the more you are being.
Process, not possession March 19, 2005
51 out of 53 found this review helpful
To have or to be?
Well... to be, says Fromm.
In response to the materialism of our century and our propensity to reification, psychoanalyst Erich Fromm proposes a mode of living that he argues is the way out of our psychospiritual conundrum.
Within the pages of this book, one of the last before his demise, the author of the bestseller _ The Art of Loving_ describes the two modes possible--that of having and being. 20th century culture he says has developed into employing and relying on the having mode--of appropriating things and even humans for oneself. Even love has been turned into an object, when in fact no such thing exists. Only the act of loving is possible.
In contradistinction to having is being. It is a mode of active participation in life. While the misnomer 'falling in love' is touted by the world as the norm, Fromm argues that true loving is an effortful activity. While accumulating knowledge is the way of having, the being mode of knowing is a process of understanding.
Although written nearly three decades ago, Fromm's worldview continues to be the ideal. This work of his is a timeless caveat against the dehumanization of society.
 To not November 7, 2003
12 out of 116 found this review helpful
This is easily the worst book I have read recently, although I can see how a lot of people will like it, especially the non-realists.It starts out mildly thought-provoking and progressively gets worst and worst. In Amazon ranking terms it starts out as a 3 and ends up as a 1 in lack of a smaller number. I hate not finishing books and I had to push myself not to abandon this one. The worst part of the book is the ending, which is Fromm's suggestions for a "sane" society. Ironically, his described world (even though an impossibility) sounds tremendously more nightmarish and "sick" than anything Kafka ever dreamt. How is it that Fromm got to write an afterword for 1984 and at the same time completely miss the point, is beyond me. It never fails to surpise me how certain people come to believe they have a solution to the world's problems. I believe that as time goes by, this and other Fromm books will become an example of things to avoid. In this respect, reading this book is not entirely useless, for it will increase your arsenal of arguments against similar artificial solutions proposed by similarly big-headed individuals.
|
|
|
|
